<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>To-Read on PostDoc Problems</title>
    <link>https://apurvanakade.github.io/blog/tags/to-read/</link>
    <description>Recent content in To-Read on PostDoc Problems</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2023 12:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://apurvanakade.github.io/blog/tags/to-read/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Automated Mathematics and the Reconfiguration of Proof and Labor</title>
      <link>https://apurvanakade.github.io/blog/maths--science/popular-science/2023-08-24-automated-mathematics-and-the-reconfiguration-of-proof-and-labor/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2023 12:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://apurvanakade.github.io/blog/maths--science/popular-science/2023-08-24-automated-mathematics-and-the-reconfiguration-of-proof-and-labor/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I came across this essay by Rodrigo Ochigame exploring possible future impact of math formalization and automation.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.11457v1&#34;&gt;Automated Mathematics and the Reconfiguration of Proof and Labor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Abstract:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This essay examines how automation has reconfigured mathematical proof and labor, and what might happen in the future. It discusses practical standards of proof, distinguishes between prominent forms of automation in research, provides critiques of recurring assumptions, and asks how automation might reshape economies of labor and credit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short tactics tutorial</title>
      <link>https://apurvanakade.github.io/blog/maths--science/lean/2023-08-30-tactics/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 21:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://apurvanakade.github.io/blog/maths--science/lean/2023-08-30-tactics/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have always wanted to learn tactics writing in Lean.&#xA;But for whatever reason, none of the tutorials that exist online have been helpful.&#xA;I suspect that the best way to learn to write tactics to play around and modify the existing ones.&#xA;I came across this short, 4-page tactics tutorial that looks promising.&#xA;I&amp;rsquo;ll give it a go when I get some time.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://www.vladasedlacek.cz/en/posts/lean-01-intro&#34;&gt;https://www.vladasedlacek.cz/en/posts/lean-01-intro&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://www.vladasedlacek.cz/en/posts/lean-02-demo&#34;&gt;https://www.vladasedlacek.cz/en/posts/lean-02-demo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://www.vladasedlacek.cz/en/posts/lean-03-tactics&#34;&gt;https://www.vladasedlacek.cz/en/posts/lean-03-tactics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://www.vladasedlacek.cz/en/posts/lean-04-linperm&#34;&gt;https://www.vladasedlacek.cz/en/posts/lean-04-linperm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
